Tuesday, June 24, 2025

The Imperative of Capital Optimization with SAP Banking

In today's dynamic financial landscape, capital optimization isn't just a buzzword; it's a strategic imperative. As capital becomes an increasingly scarce resource, financial institutions must shift their focus from mere volume to intelligently optimizing their capital allocation. This comprehensive approach is significantly bolstered by the powerful capabilities of SAP Banking's integrated financial and risk architecture, offering a robust framework for achieving this crucial goal. The Imperative of Capital Optimization The prevailing economic climate demands a re-evaluation of traditional banking models. A volume-based approach, once sufficient, now falls short in an environment where capital efficiency directly translates to sustainable growth and competitive advantage. The ability to precisely measure, strategically allocate, and ultimately reduce capital consumption is no longer a luxury but a necessity for maximizing profitability and ensuring long-term viability. This shift necessitates sophisticated tools and a deep understanding of financial flows and their impact on capital. A Three-Pillar Approach to Capital Efficiency Achieving true capital optimization can be broken down into a strategic, three-pillar framework: 1. Accurate Capital Measurement The foundational step involves gaining an unflinching clarity on capital consumption across every facet of the business. This means accurately quantifying the capital utilized in each individual market segment. SAP Banking's integrated financial and risk architecture proves invaluable here, providing the granular data and analytical tools required to precisely map where capital is being deployed and at what cost. Without this foundational understanding, efforts to optimize are largely speculative. 2. Efficient Margin Allocation Once capital consumption is precisely measured, the next crucial step is to strategically allocate margins to exposures. This isn't just about covering costs; it's about actively reducing Risk Weighted Assets (RWA) and, consequently, the capital consumed. By intelligently assigning margins, institutions can mitigate risk more effectively, leading to a leaner capital footprint. This proactive approach minimizes the capital held against potential losses, freeing it up for more productive and profitable ventures. 3. Profit Maximization Through Capital Reduction The ultimate objective of capital optimization is to maximize the bank's profit by strategically reducing consumed capital. This isn't about simply cutting corners; it's about smart capital deployment. By efficiently measuring and allocating, banks can unlock capital that would otherwise be tied up, making it available for investment in growth initiatives, new technologies, or enhanced customer offerings. This leads to a higher return on equity and a stronger financial position. Driving Innovation in Financial Risk Management The insights discussed here are a testament to the ongoing work in applying advanced analytical capabilities to complex financial challenges. The team behind this analysis possesses extensive experience in modeling intricate economic events and detailed business flows within SAP systems. This specialized knowledge enables them to go beyond theoretical concepts, providing practical solutions for measuring and optimizing both capital and liquidity consumption. Their dedication to understanding the nuances of financial data within SAP's robust architecture helps institutions not only navigate current regulatory landscapes but also strategically position themselves for future success in an increasingly capital-constrained world. Expanding the Horizon: Network-Wide Capital Optimization Let's take this concept even further. By incorporating the financial processes of your subsidiaries, partners, and even key suppliers, you can achieve a truly holistic view of your entire network's capital and liquidity. This expanded perspective unlocks powerful collaboration scenarios. Imagine a network where certain processes or entities can proactively provide capital, liquidity, or investment opportunities to others within the same ecosystem. This isn't just about internal efficiency; it's about transforming your entire business network into a more agile and financially interconnected entity, where every part contributes to the collective capital optimization. We're excited to be bringing this innovative system to market and are actively seeking business partners and investors who share our vision for transforming financial operations. If you're interested in exploring this opportunity further, please feel free to reach out directly to ferran.frances@gmail.com. Connect and Stay Informed: Join the Conversation: Connect with fellow professionals in the SAP Banking Group on LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/groups/92860/ Stay Updated: Subscribe to the SAP Banking Newsletter for the latest insights. https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/sap-banking-6893665983048081409/ Explore More: Visit the SAP Banking Blog for in-depth articles and analyses. http://sapbank.blogspot.com/ Connect Personally: Feel free to send a LinkedIn invitation; I'm always open to connecting with like-minded individuals. I look forward to hearing your perspectives. Kindest Regards, Ferran Frances-Gil.

Friday, June 20, 2025

Get Ready for IFRS 9 and IFRS 15 and Capital Optimization with Revenue Accounting and Reporting and Bank Analyzer

It's been a while now since January 1, 2018, when IFRS 9 and IFRS 15 became mandatory accounting standards for banks and corporations. In my experience, a surprising number of organizations are still far from ready to fully comply with these critical legal requirements. We're going to see the consequences of this unpreparedness unfold over the coming months.

There's also a good deal of confusion surrounding what IFRS 9 and IFRS 15 actually mean for businesses. Let's break it down with a practical example to make it clearer.


Understanding IFRS 15: Revenue from Customer Contracts

IFRS 15 focuses on revenue from contracts with customers, with a particularly noticeable impact on agreements that bundle both services and goods.

Let's imagine a telecommunications company. They sign a contract with a customer for 12 months of internet access at €35/month and a subsidized Wi-Fi router for €50.

Before IFRS 15, the accounting for this was straightforward: the company would recognize €35 in revenue each month for the internet service and a one-time €50 revenue for the router sale. Simple, right?

With IFRS 15, things get more nuanced. Companies now must adjust revenue recognition based on the fair price of each sold component (router and internet access) and the completion of their commitment to the client (delivering the router and providing internet access). Since the router was subsidized because the customer committed to a 12-month internet contract, it makes sense that a portion of the router's revenue should be distributed over those 12 months of internet service.

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) provides a five-step process to meet IFRS 15 requirements:

  1. Identify the contract with the customer: This is about clearly defining the agreement where the company promises to deliver a bundle of services and goods, like our telecom example.
  2. Identify separate performance obligations: These are the distinct promises made to the client to transfer goods or services. In our example, the two performance obligations are providing the internet service and delivering the router. Crucially, the company must also determine the "Stand-Alone Selling Price" for each obligation – this is the fair price if each was sold separately.
    • A note on technology: While SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting (current version 1.3) doesn't automatically determine Stand-Alone Selling Prices, companies can use historical average prices to figure them out.
    • For our example, let's assume the Stand-Alone Selling Price for internet access is €40/month and for the router is €55.
  3. Determine the transaction price: This is the actual price the company is charging the client for each performance obligation. In our case, it's €35/month for internet and €50 for the router.
  4. Allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation: This step ensures the revenue recognized reflects the value delivered for each good/service. Here's how it breaks down for our example:
Performance ObligationTransaction PriceStandalone Selling PriceAllocated AmountCalculation of the Allocated Amount
Router€50€55€48(€470 total transaction price) * (€55 router Standalone Price) / (€535 total Standalone Price)
12-month Internet Service€420 (€35*12)€480 (€40*12)€422(€470 total transaction price) * (€480 internet Standalone Price) / (€535 total Standalone Price)
Total€470€535€470
  1. Recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied: This is where the actual accounting takes place over time.

    • Month 1: The router (Performance Obligation 1) is fully delivered, and 8.33% of the internet service (Performance Obligation 2) is provided. Revenue recognized: €48 (router) + €35.17 (internet) = €83.17.
    • Months 2-10: 8.33% of the internet service is provided each month. Revenue recognized: €35.17.
    • Months 11-12: 8.33% of the internet service is provided each month. Revenue recognized: €35.16.

Understanding IFRS 9: Expected Credit Loss

Now, let's switch gears to IFRS 9. When a company issues invoices, it takes on credit risk – the risk that the customer won't pay. IFRS 9 outlines the process for measuring the Expected Loss from this credit risk.

This process begins by determining the Probability of Default (PD) for the client. This is typically based on a credit risk model that categorizes clients according to the payment behavior of similar risk segments. This "historization" process is often supported by systems like SAP Bank Analyzer.

The second step involves determining a Fair Value provision. This provision will reduce the recognized revenue until the client actually makes the payment. The amount of this provision is calculated through a Key Date Valuation within modules like AFI-Bank Analyzer. It involves discounting the cash flow (the amount due) using a yield curve with the same maturity as the cash flow, along with the corresponding spread for the client's Probability of Default.

Naturally, if the client fails to pay on time and the account receivable becomes impaired, this provision will increase.


The Implementation Challenge

SAP offers a comprehensive business suite designed to help companies meet these new accounting standards. However, there's a significant bottleneck: scarce technical and functional skills needed to implement them. This scarcity makes these implementation projects incredibly challenging.

What are your thoughts on these new standards and the challenges they pose? I'm eager to read your opinions.

Kindest Regards,

Ferran.